U.S. Historical Timeline of Tyranny
Click link to open this excellent 22 page article for easier reading & printing in PDF
U.S. Legal History (Author Unknown)
U.S. Law is Private Merchant Law, leaving the people as Surety and Debtor on the
bankruptcy.
Law is contract, universally and in the U.S., so we must follow the progression of
contractual agreements, which constitute the underlying U.S. Law. (We cannot
address all individual laws and cases or you would not have time in a life to review
it, even though ignorance of the millions of laws, statutes, codes, etc... is no
excuse in Private Admiralty Jurisdictions.)
In basically chronological order, the following progression of contracts, and our
interpretation of them follows:
The USA, a corporation of the English Crown, is bankrupt, and has been since at
least 1788. The Articles of Confederation states in Article 12: “All bills of credit
emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of
Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present
confederation, shall be deemed as considered a charge against the United States,
for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith
are hereby solemnly pledged.” The “Founding Fathers,” as constitutors,
acknowledged and reorganized the debt in the US Constitution 1787, Article VI,
hence “constitution.” Bankruptcy occurred on January 1, 1788 based on 21 loans
that the United States of America received from the King of England dating from
February 28, 1778 through July 5, 1782, the repayment of which had been ratified
by Congress on January 22, 1783. The United States Bank, created in 1791, was a
private bank, with 18,000 of 25,000 shares owned by England.
No de jure, constitutional Congress has existed since March 27, 1861 when seven
(7) Southern States walked out of Congress lClick link to open this excellent 22 page article for easier reading & printing in PDF eaving Congress without a quorum
for adjourning and therefore ending sine die. That which is called “Congress”
today assembles and acts under the authority of the President acting in capacity
of being Commander-In-Chief of the Armed Forces, under emergency war-powers
rule, i.e. “law of necessity,” i.e. no law (see 12 Stat 319, which has never been
repealed and exists in Title 50 USC §§ 212, 213, 215, Appendix 16, 26 CFR Chapter
1 § 303.1-6(a), and 31 CFR Chapter 5 § 500.701 Penalties).
Since the above-referenced date, March 27, 1861, Americans have been under
Fascist rule via presidential executive order under the aforementioned Emergency
War Powers, 12 USC 95 a, b. Every “citizen of the United States” is now “legally”
established as an “enemy” via the Amendatory Act of March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,
amending Trading with Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, H.R. 4960, Public Law No.
91.
December 6th, 1865, the 14th Amendment was proclaimed as ratified (even
though it never properly was, see below). The 14th Amendment, which is private
Roman Catholic Ecclesiastical Trust Law, constitutes a constructive, cestui que
trust, a public charitable trust, “PCT,” that was expressly designed to bring every
corporate franchise artificial person called a “citizen of the United States” into an
inseparable merging with the government until the two are united (with the
power inhering in the government, not the people). A cestui que trust is
fundamentally different from a regular trust, which is express in nature and
consists of a contractual indenture involving three (3) parties: Grantor (Creator or
Trustor), Trustee, and Beneficiaries. In an express trust, legal ownership is
transferred by written contract between Grantor and Trustee in which the
Grantor surrenders ownership of property to the legal person, the Trust, to be
managed by the Trustee on behalf of those who are to benefit from the
arrangement, the Beneficiaries. A cestui que trust, on the other hand, differs from
an express trust in several crucial ways:
a. It is not formed by express contract, i.e. overt agreement expressed in writing,
but by legal construction, i.e. fiat.
b. A cestui que trust has no Grantor, but, being a constructive trust created by
operation of law, i.e. by make-believe, has only co-trustees and co-beneficiaries.
The co-trustees are the parties with the duties for managing property for the
“public good,” i.e. for the benefit of those designated as co-beneficiaries.
The Legislative Act of February 21, 1871, Forty-first Congress, Session III, Chapter
62, page 419, chartered a Federal company entitled “United States,” a/k/a “US
Inc.,” a “Commercial Agency” originally designated as “Washington, D.C.,” in
accordance with the so-called 14th Amendment, which the record indicates was
never ratified (see Utah Supreme Court Cases, Dyett v Turner, (1968) 439 P2d
266, 267; State v Phillips, (1975) 540 P 2d 936; as well as Coleman v. Miller, 307
U.S. 448, 59 S. Ct. 972; 28 Tulane Law Review, 22; 11 South Carolina Law
Quarterly 484; Congressional Record, June 13, 1967, pp. 15641-15646). A “citizen
of the United States” is a civilly dead entity operating as a co-trustee and co-
beneficiary of the PCT, the constructive, cestui que trust of US Inc. under the 14th
Amendment, which upholds the debt of the USA and US Inc. in Section 4.
In conformity with the above-referenced creation of United States (1871) and the
14th Amendment, the Legislature of each State created a limited-liability
corporation, chartered in a private, military, international, commercial,
admiralty/maritime jurisdiction, entitled “STATE OF...” e.g. “STATE OF
CALIFORNIA,” as evidenced by, inter alia, the change in the seal and the creation
of a new constitution, e.g. Constitution of the State of California (1879),
concerning which, re California:
a. A general partnership agreement, hereinafter “General Partnership,” exists
between the California Republic (1849), and STATE OF CALIFORNIA (1879), with
STATE OF CALIFORNIA acting as governmental controller.
b. STATE OF CALIFORNIA now acts as an agent/instrumentality of United States,
collecting whole life insurance premiums, known as “taxes,” for the International
Monetary Fund, based, inter alia, upon the Limited Liability Act of 1851 and the
bankruptcy of United States of 1933, see House Joint Resolution 192 of June 5,
1933; Public Law 73-10; Perry v. U.S. (1935), 294 U.S. 330-381, 79 L Ed 912; 31
USC 5112, 5119.
Inasmuch as all law is contract, the contract involved in a constructive trust is an
implied contract. An implied contract can be ratified by two (2) means:
a. Acquiescence by silence, i.e. the “government” asserts its intentions concerning
your life, rights, and property and you assent, don’t rebut, and compliantly go
along with what they claim. In 1871 the Government changed the nature of its
contract with the people from law as defined by the original Constitution of 1787
that recognizes law (common law), admiralty (on the sea only), and equity
(functioning by voluntary contract between all participating parties), and began
relating to people as if they were “citizens of the Unites States” within/under the
private, commercial, international, military jurisdiction of the new de facto
corporation, i.e. US Inc. They offered people a “new deal,” and almost everyone
bought it (based on naïve and foolish trust and assuming that everything was OK).
The people were thereby denied access to law and placed on the ship of state of
US Inc. where the captain’s word is law and no one has any rights. As Jefferson
phrased the matter, “As government grows, liberty recedes.”
b. You expressly accept “benefits” offered by the government, and thereby
finalize the contract by deed. This is similar to finalizing a contract with a
restaurant by sitting down at a table, reading a menu, and then ordering and
consuming a meal. By your deeds you affirm to the restaurant that you will pay
for the meal in accordance with the price stated on the menu. No written
contract is signed, but a contract is formed nevertheless.
By the above two (2) means people give implied assent that they are bound by an
alleged contract with US Inc. in accordance with the terms and conditions that
inhere in being treated as a “citizen of the United States” under the 14th
Amendment, and are therefore placed into permanent legal status as a Debtor
and Surety for U.S. Inc. In such a position people leave the ground of sovereignty
and all capacity for asserting their unalienable rights in favor of being presumed
as having exercised their sovereignty and free-will autonomy for the purpose of
going along with the government’s assertion that they sacrifice everything for the
“public good,” i.e. the PCT. By so doing people lose their standing in law, i.e. they
“die a civil death in the law.” They are placed in the legal position of mortmain
(i.e. as if deceased) and are shorn of capacity for asserting their rights, since the
presumption is that they have already exercised those rights for the purpose of
being placed in the position they are in, i.e. property of the government with a
lien against you and everything your life labor could ever create, including your
children. The private being (the real individual) is sacrificed for the good of the
public (the imaginary collective).
When people die such a civil death in the law they are like ghosts, and thereby
incapable of managing their own affairs and enjoying their unalienable rights. Like
the estate of a decedent, they are then managed by the executors/administrators
of the estate, in probate. Such is the condition of every “citizen of the United
States” today in law, managed by the government agencies acting as
executors/administrators of their estates in bankruptcy, legal incapacity, and civil
death as assets of the bankrupt US. The US is property of the private Real Parties
of Interest, the Creditors in bankruptcy.
The 14th Amendment was allegedly established for the purpose of creating a
citizenship for the liberated blacks, and other disenfranchised people, who
otherwise had no citizenship because they could not comply with the
requirements for state citizenship. What actually happened was that the blacks
were taken off of the Southern slave plantations and placed into the slave
plantation of US Inc., a far worse lot. The government then gradually absorbed
everyone else—including state citizens—into the same condition.
1871-1913. Officers of the actual government held office in dual capacity, i.e. in
both USA and US Inc. status.
1912. Bonds issued by US Inc. came due but US Inc. did not have the resources for
paying their creditors (the seven families that founded the Federal Reserve Bank),
so US Inc.’s owner (the actual government) was required to pay the balance. The
national government was also without sufficient funds to meet US Inc.’s
obligations, so the creditors settled for all of the assets of both US Inc. and the
national government instead of foreclosure on and liquidation of the entire
country. By so doing they expropriated the nation—both USA and US Inc. Sic
transit America.
1912. US Inc. forms an agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank (It is important
to note that both of these entities are private corporations which removes the
general allegations of treason or fraud from this relationship). Through this
agreement US Inc. must function in debt, even though they have neither funds
nor resources for financing their operation.
1912. The first corporate only Senators are seated in the next election year by
popular vote of the US Inc. registered voters. The original-jurisdiction national
Senators of the States did not assume office that year and at least one third of the
nation’s Senators seats were lawfully and voluntarily vacant.
February 3rd, 1913. US Inc. passes its 16th Amendment and Congress orders the
Secretary of State to enter it as ratified even though the States had not ratified it
according to Law. The Secretary complied. It should be noted that this would not
have been lawful if it were a national Constitution amendment, however it was
perfectly legal within the colorable, de facto corporation. It should also be noted
that where the national Constitution already had a 16th amendment and where
the Supreme Court says that the new 16th Amendment did not do anything, this
corporate amendment must simply be a space filler entered such that US Inc.’s
Constitution (1871) would have the same number of amendments as that of the
national Constitution (1787).
April 8th, 1913. US Inc. passes its 17th amendment and Congress orders it to be
entered as ratified in the exact same manner as they did with US Inc.’s 16th
Amendment. This amendment changes where US Inc.’s Senators are elected. This
amendment is not even lawfully possible as a national Constitution amendment
for several reasons, not the least of which is that the amendment would have
required that Congress first pass an amendment that stated that they had the
power to say where Senators are elected before they could even deliberate on
such a subject matter, after which they would then have to have competent
ratifications performed on such amendments in accord with constitutional limits,
not as was done with US Inc.’s 16th Amendment.
December 23, 1913. The Congress, late at night with only a small cadre of
supporters present, passed the Federal Reserve Act, surrendering the creation
and management of the nation’s currency into the hands of a cartel of private—
and mostly foreign—bankers. Currency is the single most essential and critical
commodity in the world, embodying more law and principles of commerce than
any other. Since all interactions are “commerce,” and the medium of doing
business in commerce is currency, money is in a very significant sense the
measure of all things. By abandoning control and management of the money
supply the nation surrendered all capacity for claiming sovereignty. The
government lost its independent treasury (one of the requirements in law for
national sovereignty). The United States Government became a mere fiefdom, or
administrative arm, of the bankers, who now owned the store.
Passage of the Federal Reserve Act was a major milestone on the “road to
serfdom” that this entire progression outlines. The conspiratorial nature of
matters is exemplified in comments by one of the major actors in the triumph of
the Federal Reserve, Edward Mandell House, who had this to say in a private
meeting with President Woodrow Wilson:
“[Very] soon, every American will be required to register their biological property
in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate
under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel
people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for
our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being
unable to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the
security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the
scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly
delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever
to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges. They will
be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a
profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever
figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our
arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund
government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits
and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest
expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud which we will
call “Social Insurance.” Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any
loss we may incur and in this manner, every American will unknowingly be our
servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any
hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of
our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
1917. Corporate-only Senators begin participating in all matters with those
Senators who still had original jurisdiction government capacity, as a result of
which all activities of the government were performed in corporate capacity only.
1917. President Wilson was re-elected by the Electoral College, but only US Inc.’s
Senate performed the Senate confirmation necessary for seating the national
President. There was no national government Senate confirmation; no national
seats were seated and all remained vacant. Note: the national President is also
the Military’s Commander in Chief, and under the nation’s status of being ruled
by the private, commercial, martial-law rule of the Bankers and English Crown,
the business needs of the nation have remained under US Inc. control since 1871,
i.e. ever since US Inc. was incorporated and made operational over such matters.
1917-1944. All national government seats are and remain vacant, and US Inc.
continues maintaining the business needs of the government under martial-law
rule. June 5, 1933. US Inc. declares bankruptcy under House Joint Resolution,
“HJR,” 192.
1935. The Social Security Act is passed.
On application, the new Social Security Administration (hereinafter “SSA”) creates
a private Trust with a trust name that sounds like the name of the applicant
except the Trust’s name is spelled with all capital letters. SSA makes the applicant
a co-trustee of the namesake Trust, designates the SSA General Trust Fund as the
Beneficiary of the namesake trust, and assigns the Trust a Social Security General
Trust Fund Account number re the applicant for accounting and identification
purposes.
1938. In Erie Railroad v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64-92, the U.S. Supreme Court
sets the presumption regarding the status and capacity of an individual as that of
General Capacity/General Partnership relationship with the namesake Trust, as if
the two (2) entities—individual and namesake Trust—were one-in-the-same
person.
1944. In the Bretton Woods Agreement US Inc. is quit-claimed into the newly
formed International Monetary Fund (hereinafter “IMF”) in exchange for the
power allowing US Inc.’s President the right of naming (seating and controlling)
the governors and general managers of the International Monetary Fund, The
World Bank for Reconstruction and Development, and the Inter-American Bank
also formed in that agreement (codified at United States Code Title 22 § 286). It
must be noted that this act created an unlawful conflict of interest between US
Inc. (with its new foreign owner) and its purpose of carrying out the business
needs of the national government. This is the cause of our use of the term
“original-jurisdiction” government. With the new foreign owner of US Inc. a
conflict of interest is created between the national government and US Inc., even
though the contracted purpose of US Inc. has not changed on its face.
1962. At the National Governor’s Conference in Lexington, Kentucky, US Inc.
informs the governors, under the guise of “public necessity”, that they must all
form, or reform existing, private corporations under US Inc. (in their state’s
interest), so that the people will not discover what the state governments are
doing with the people’s money (dabbling in foreign notes, i.e. Federal Reserve
Notes (FRNs), bonds, and evidences of debt), which activity is forbidden from
State governments by their own State Constitutions, which information would
likely cause a people’s revolt ending in the State official’s being at worst killed and
at least replaced. The proposed incorporation deadline was 1968.
1970. By this time each State revised its constitution and statutes and formed
private corporate entities of the name “STATE OF (X)” (where “(X)” is
representative of the common State name), and then vacated their original
jurisdiction government seats in favor of foreign ownership and control under the
mandate of US Inc.
It appears that this was all done so a General Partnership could be presumed as
existing between “The State” (of the national Union of States) and “STATE OF (X)”,
a private corporation. Said STATE OF (X), as General Partner, then assumes the
role of governmental operator/controller. This scenario is further proven by the
fact that these corporate entities cannot handle gold and silver coin of the United
States of America in commercial transactions without violating the Par Value
Modifications Act and the Foreign Currency Exchange Act.
April 19th, 1994. Federal agents attack, burn, and raze the compound, killing
approximately 100 of the members of a reglious sect, without any lawful cause for
the action.
50 USC 1520 et seq. demonstrates that there exists an agenda for using
Americans (Sovereign and otherwise) as biological test subjects. This is a
fundamental breach of an alleged Constitutional contract.
President Clinton pushes for a mandatory health care bill for the purpose of
placing the physical bodies of all Americans under control of US Inc., with
international identification attached, for the purpose of tagging the populace, as
per the Biblical prophecy of the Mark of the Beast. The computer that would
handle the tracking is even identified with the acronym: B.E.A.S.T.
What the above progression depicts is the systematic growth of the power, scope,
and pervasive control of Government exercised against the American people by
foreign, criminal, and hostile powers. This same dreary gestalt constitutes the
nature of man’s history on this planet as far back as the eye can see. Civilizations
rise, fall, and disappear, replaced by new ones that—based upon being founded
on, and functioning in accordance with, wrong principles—are foredoomed for
extinction, as were all of their predecessors and as all future civilizations will be
until mankind finally learns and ceases “beating a dead horse” by structuring law,
commerce, religion, and social organization in general on principles that are
existentially impossible.
The above progression has proceeded in America by implementing such strategy
as:
1. Relentlessly instilling in people the foundational idea that governments in
general are absolutely essential in the society of man and that the Government in
America is the people’s friend and servant, i.e. a “government of the people, by
the people, and for the people.” These premises are untrue—self-serving cons by
those who want the power.
2. Creating governmentally owned corporate franchises, such as a “citizen of the
United States” and one’s all-capital-letter name, with which people are deceived
into identifying.
3. Regarding every citizen of the United States as contractually being:
a. A corporate citizen, i.e. a corporate franchise;
b. A co-trustee (with duties) and co-beneficiary (with privileges) of the 14th
Amendment Public Charitable cestui que Trust;
c. Pledged as an asset in the bankruptcy of US Inc., and therefore a co-surety for
the debts of US Inc.;
d. An enemy of the Creditors;
e. Chattel property of the Bankers and Power Elite;
f. A slave with no capacity for asserting any rights, no standing in law, and no
capacity for contracting.
4. Functioning on the presumption that the individual being, with autonomy and
free will, knowingly, intentionally, and voluntarily contracted into the situation of
being united—like heads and tails of a coin—with a corporate entity created and
owned by the Government.
As per the established maxim of law, “As a thing is bound, so it is unbound,” the
way out of the problem is within and through the problem. This is accomplished
by understanding what the problem is, i.e. its structure and character, just as
solving the problem of a plugged drain is accomplished by realizing that the
problem is the plugged drain, whereby the solution consists of unplugging the
drain. “Know the truth and the truth shall make you free.”
The United States Library of Congress now has between 2,000,000 and 3,000,000
books on law. Any law library is a daunting place, possessing row after row of
shelves with books full of fine print. Making knowledge of such “law” even more
unattainable is not only that what passes for law today perpetually changes,
altered by every new court case/opinion, legislative enactment, and all of the
ever-changing policies, rules, and regulations of administrative agencies, but an
immense amount of the world’s law today, as actually implemented, is unwritten
and inaccessible.
This is not only because judges operate in general equity in which the ultimate
arbiter of a matter is the “conscience of the court” (i.e. how the judge feels about
something that day), but because almost all of the world’s law is the private Law
Merchant of the Creditors in bankruptcy of the world’s nations, essentially all of
which are insolvent and in receivership to the Bankers. This private Law Merchant
is of ancient origin, and is implemented today by men whose identities are
unknown to the mass of mankind.
In the face of this undependability of law we may ask some fundamental and
ingenuous questions:
1. Is there such a thing as genuine law that is timeless, stable, and dependable?
2. If so, can such universal law be effectively invoked and utilized in practice
today? How can I use it to ensure my inalienable sovereign birth rights to life and
happiness?
3. If genuine law exists, why is it not taught and uniformly utilized instead of the
chaotic and colorable charade that dominates the legal field today?
4. Can we integrate said universal law with the ephemeral, desultory “law” that
now enslaves the overwhelming majority of people on this planet?
Fortunately, affirmative answers all of the above questions. Answering them, and
obtaining a clear understanding and effective, practical ways for utilizing genuine
law, is found through individual study and contemplation.
The Birth Certificate
Since the early 1960's, State governments themselves specially created, juristic,
corporate persons signified by all caps have issued Birth Certificates to "persons"
with legal fiction all-caps names. This is not a lawful record of your physical birth,
but rather the birth of the juristic, all-caps name. It may appear to be your true
name, but since no proper name is ever written in all caps (either lawfully or
grammatically) it does not identify who you are. The Birth Certificate is the
government’s self-created document of title for its new property, i.e. the deed to
the juristic-name artificial person whose all-caps name mirrors your true name.
The Birth Certificate brings the new all-caps name into colorable
admiralty/maritime law, the same way a ship (and ship of state) is berthed.
One important area to address, before going any further, is the governmental use
of older data storage from the late 1950's until the early 1980's. As a "left over"
from various teletype- oriented systems, many government data storage methods
used all caps for proper names. The IRS was supposedly still complaining about
some of their antiquated storage systems as recent as the early 1980's. At first,
this may have been a necessity of the technology at the time, not a deliberate act.
Perhaps, when this technology was first being used and implemented into the
mainstream of communications, some legal experts saw it as a perfect tool for
their perfidious intentions. What better excuse could there be?
However, since local, State, and Federal offices primarily used typewriters during
that same time period, and Birth Certificates and other important documents,
such as driver's licenses, were produced with typewriters, it's very doubtful that
this poses much of an excuse to explain all-caps usage for proper names. The only
reasonable usage of the older databank all- caps storage systems would have
been for addressing envelopes or certain forms in bulk, including payment checks,
which the governments did frequently.
Automated computer systems, with daisy-wheel and pin printers used prevalently
in the early 1980's, emulated the IBM electric typewriter Courier or Helvetica
fonts in both upper and lower case letters. Shortly thereafter, the introduction of
laser and ink-jet printers with multiple fonts became the standard. For the past
fifteen years, there is no excuse that the government computers will not
accommodate the use of lower case letters unless the older data is still stored in
its original form, i.e. all caps, and has not been translated due to the costs of re-
entry. But this does not excuse the entry of new data, only "legacy" data. In fact,
on many government forms today, proper names are in all caps while other areas
of the same computer produced document are in both upper and lower case. One
can only conclude that now, more than ever, the use of all caps in substitution the
writing a proper name is no mistake.
When a child is born, the hospital sends the original, not a copy, of the record of
live birth to the "State Bureau of Vital Statistics," sometimes called the
"Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services" (HRS). Each STATE is required
to supply the UNITED STATES with birth, death, and health statistics. The STATE
agency that receives the original record of live birth keeps it and then issues a
Birth Certificate in the corrupted, all-caps version of the baby’s true name, i.e.
JAMES WILBER SMITH.
cer-tif-i-cate, noun. Middle English certificat, from Middle French, from Medieval
Latinceruficatum. from Late Latin, neuter of certificatus, past participle of
certificare, to certify, 15th century. 3: a document evidencing ownership or debt--
Merriam Webster Dictionary (1998).
The Birth Certificate issued by the State is then registered with the U.S.
Department of Commerce -- the Executive Office -- specifically through their own
sub-agency, the U.S. Census Bureau, which is responsible to register vital statistics
from all the States. The word "registered," as it is used within commercial or legal
based equity law, does not mean that the all-caps name was merely noted in a
book for reference purposes. When a Birth Certificate is registered with the U.S.
Department of Commerce, it means that the all-caps legal person named thereon
has become a surety or guarantor, a condition and obligation that is automatically
and unwittingly assumed unless you rebut the presumption by effectively noticing
them: It aint me.
registered. Security, bond. -- Merriam-Webster Dictionary of Law (1996).
Security. I a: Something (as a mortgage or collateral) that is provided to make
certain the fulfillment of an obligation. Example: used his property as security for
a loan. lb: "surety." 2: Evidence of indebtedness, ownership, or the right to
ownership. -- Ibid.
Bond. I a: A usually formal written agreement by which a person undertakes to
perform a certain act (as fulfill the obligations of a contract) . . with the condition
that failure to perform or abstain will obligate the person . . to pay a sum of
money or will result in the forfeiture of money put up by the person or surety. lb:
One who acts as a surety. 2: An interest-bearing document giving evidence of a
debt issued by a government body or corporation that is sometimes secured by a
lien on property and is often designed to take care of a particular financial need. -
- Ibid.
Surety. The person who has pledged him or herself to pay back money or perform
a certain action if the principal to a contract fails, as collateral, and as part of the
original contract. -- Duhaime's Law Dictionary.
1: a formal engagement (as a pledge) given for the fulfillment of an undertaking.
2: one who promises to answer for the debt or default of another.
Under the Uniform Commercial Code, however, a surety includes a guarantor,
and the two terms are generally interchangeable. Merriam Webster's "Dictionary
of Law" (1996).
Guarantor. A person who pledges collateral for the contract of another, but
separately, as part of an independently contract with the obligee of the original
contract. Duhaime's Law Dictionary.
It is not difficult to see that a state-created Birth Certificate, with an all-caps,
name is a document evidencing debt the moment it is issued. Once a state has
registered a birth document with the U.S. Department of Commerce, the
Department notifies the Treasury Department, which takes out a loan from the
Federal Reserve. The Treasury uses the loan to purchase a bond (the Fed holds a
purchase money security interest in the bond) from the Department of
Commerce, which invests the sale proceeds in the stock or bond market. The
Treasury Department then issues Treasury securities in the form of Treasury
Bonds, Notes, and Bills using the bonds as surety for the new securities. This cycle
is based on the future tax revenues of the legal person whose name appears on
the Birth Certificate. This also means that the bankrupt, corporate U.S. can
guarantee to the purchasers of their securities the lifetime labor and tax revenues
of every citizen of the United States/American with a Birth Certificate as collateral
for payment. This device is initiated simply by converting the lawful, true name of
the child into a legal, juristic name of a person.
Dubuque rei potissinia pars prineipium est The principal part of everything is in
the beginning. (Well begun is half done.)
Legally, you are considered to be a slave or indentured servant to the various
Federal, State and local governments via your STATE-issued and STATE-created
Birth Certificate in the name of your all-caps person. Birth Certificates are issued
so that the issuer can claim exclusive title to the legal person created thereby.
This is further compounded when one voluntarily obtains a Drivers License or a
Social Security Account Number. The state even owns your personal and private
life through your STATE-issued marriage license/certificate issued in the all-caps
names. You have no rights in birth, marriage, or even death. The state holds title
to all legal persons the state creates via Birth Certificates until the rightful owner,
i.e. you, reclaims/redeems it by becoming the holder in due course of the
instrument.
The various bankruptcies The main problem is that the mother and father, and
then the eighteen-year-old man or woman, voluntarily agreed to this contrived
system of plunder and slavery by remaining silent a legal default, latches, and
failing to claim one’s own Rights. The maxim of law becomes crucially operative:
He who fails to assert his rights has none.
The legal rules and codes enforce themselves. There is no court hearing to
determine if those rules are correct. Government rules are self-regulating and
self-supporting. Once set into motion, such "laws" automatically come into effect
provided the legal process has been followed.
The legal person known as the UNITED STATES is bankrupt and holds no lawful
Constitutionally mandated silver or gold gold coin or bullion with which to back
any currency. All private held and federally held gold coins and bullion in America
was seized via Executive Order of April 5, 1933 and paid to the creditor, the
private Federal Reserve Corporation under the terms of the bankruptcy.
Congress still convening strictly under Executive Order authority confirmed the
bankruptcy through the Joint Resolution to Suspend the Gold Standard and
Abrogate the Gold Clause, June 5, 1933, House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192, June 5,
1933, 73 Congress, 1st Session, Public Law 73-10. This 1933 public law states, in
part:
"... every provision contained in or made with respect to any obligation which
purports to give
the oblige a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of coin or
currency, or in an
amount in money of the United States measured thereby, is declared to be
against public policy."
The corporate U.S. declared bankruptcy a second time, whereby the Secretary of
Treasury was appointed Receiver for the bankrupt U.S. in Reorganization Plan No.
26, Title 5 USC 903, Public Law 94-564, "Legislative History," page 5967.
Since 1933, the only assets used by the UNITED STATES to pay its debt to the Fed
have been the blood, sweat, and tears of every American unfortunate to be
saddled with a Birth Certificate and a Social Security Account Number (the U.S.
Government must conceal this fact from the American people at all cost). Their
future labor and tax revenues have been legally pledged via the new all-caps,
juristic-person names appearing on the Birth Certificates, i.e. the securities used
as collateral for loans of credit (thin-air belief) to pay daily operational costs, re-
organization expenses in bankruptcy, insurance policy premiums required to float
the bankrupt government, and interest on the ever-increasing, wholly fraudulent,
debt.
The foundation of what we are dealing with.
In 1921, the federal Sheppard-Towner Maternity Act (3) was passed creating birth
"registration" or what we now know as the "birth certificate." It was known as the
"Maternity Act" and was sold to the American people as a law that would reduce
maternal and infant mortality, protect the health of mothers and infants, and for
“other purposes”. However the Act did not give full disclosure, their Brady
Doctrine requirement under common law and statutory law, as to the “other
purposes”.
In 1933, bankruptcy was covertly declared by President Roosevelt. The governors
of the then 48 States pledged the "full faith and credit" of their states, including
the people, as collateral for loans of credit from the Federal Reserve System. The
"Full faith and credit" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 4. Sec. 1 requires that
foreign judgment be given such faith and credit as it had by law or usage of state
of its origin, and that the foreign statutes are to have force and effect to which
they are entitled to in the home State. And that a judgment or record shall have
the same faith, credit, conclusive effect, and obligatory force in other states as it
has by law or usage in the state from whence taken. Black's Law Dictionary, 4th
Ed. cites omitted.
Today the federal government "mandates, orders and compels" the States to
enforce federal jurisdiction upon it's citizens/subjects. I believe the federal
government draws its de facto jurisdiction for these actions from the "Doctrine of
Parens Patriae." Parens Patriae means literally, "parent of the country." It refers
traditionally to the role of STATE as sovereign and guardian of persons under legal
disability. Parens Patriae originates from the English common law where the King
had a royal prerogative to act as guardian to persons with legal disabilities such as
infants. Note: The Maternity Act was eventually repealed, but parts of it have
been found in other legislative acts. What this act attempted to do was set up
government by appointment, run by bureaucrats with re-delegated authority.
With the birth registration established, the federal government, under the
doctrine of Parens Patriae, had the mechanism to take over all the assets of the
American people and put them into debt into perpetuity. Under this doctrine, if
one is born with a disability, the state, (the sovereign) has the responsibility to
take care of you. I believe that the disability you are born with is, in fact, the birth
itself. I believe that when you are born, you are born free, "a man or woman of
the soil." You as parents, without full disclosure under law, make application for a
"birth certificate," and when you sign a state's birth certificate - you have made
your child a transferable asset - identical to a stock certificate thereby making the
child a citizen with a national character of the corporate government known as
the United States. The government then turns the new citizen into a corporation,
a legal fiction, under the laws of the state. The birth information is collected by
the state and is then turned over to the U.S. Department of Commerce. The
corporation is then placed into a "trust", known as a "Cestui Que Trust". A
Cestui que trust is defined as: "He who has a right to a beneficial interest in and
out of an estate the legal title to which is vested in another; the beneficiary of
another." Cestui que use is: "He for whose use and benefit lands or tenements are
held by another. The Cestui que user has the right to receive the profits and
benefits of the estate, but the legal title and possession, as well the duty of
defending the same, reside in the other."
The government becomes the Trustee, while the child becomes the contributing
beneficiary of his own trust. Legal title to everything the child will ever own is now
vested in the federal government. The government then places the Trust into the
hands of the parents, who are made the "guardians." The child may reside in the
hands of the guardians (parents) until such time as the state claims that the
parents are no longer capable to serve. The state then goes into the home and
removes the subject matter of the trust from the guardians. At majority, the
parents lose their guardianship.
The subject of every birth certificate is a child. The child is a valuable asset, which
if properly trained, can contribute valuable assets provided by its labor for many
years. The child itself is the asset of the trust established by the birth certificate.
"Title" to your child is now owned by the state. The state now directs the trust
corpus and provides "benefits" for the beneficiary – the corpus and beneficiary
being one and the same -- the man or woman -- first as child, then as adult.
Each one of us, including our children, are considered assets of the bankrupt
United States which acts as the "Debtor in Possession." We are now designated
by this government as "HUMAN RESOURCES," with new such resources being
added (born) continually. The bankruptcy is a receivership, rather than a
discharged bankruptcy. The bankruptcy debts are serviced, not paid or
discharged. The Human Resources service the debt, which continues to grow with
time.
The federal government, under Title 15, U.S.C., re-delegates federal Parens
Patriae authority to the state attorney generals. The attorney generals can now
enforce all legislation involving your personal life, the lives of your children, and
your material assets.
Understanding the birth registration process
Remember in Admiralty Vessels documented by registration under the laws of the
United States are entitled to privileges and subject to the obligations prescribed
by the laws of the United States for merchant vessels.
To start out with, your parents due to their prior birth registration were already
considered being registered documented vessels/mentally incompetent wards of
the State, being under the guardianship of the State, who by legal marriage,
where the State is a third party to the marriage contract, had an offspring/ward
which they brought into this world by delivery1, the act by which the res the
subject matter of a trust, or substance thereof was placed within the actual or
constructive possession or control of another in the delivery room of the
maternity ward of the hospital, the port of entry for vessels/wards. Then they
asked your mother for your legal name2 in Upper Lower case which consists of
one Christian name and one surname which is the name on the RECORD OF LIVE
BIRTH written in upper and lowercase letters. What your mother was not told is
that she delivered you to an agent/licensed doctor of the State, in a federally
funded hospital, an act by which the res3 the subject matter of a trust or
substance thereof was placed within the actual or constructive possession or
control of another, the State, for which in equity they created a Certificate of Live
Birth with the all CAPITAL LETTERS and recorded that warehouse receipt in the
commercial registry as cargo under transportation.
The hospital documented your birth with the legal name Title4 in a distinctive
style or appellation, Upper Lower case, the name by which anything is known, and
because under trust law whenever title or money is transferred, a trust is created
by operation of law, representing you, for which they created a CERTIFICATE OF
LIVE BIRTH in all CAPITAL LETTERS, which was filed with the local Registrar and
registered with the State, via Certificate of registry5, in commercial maritime law
which is a certificate of registration of a vessel according to the registry acts, for
the purpose of giving her a national character i.e. U.S. citizen born in a federal
zone, hospital zip code, in the judicial district in which the birthing of the vessel
occurred identified by the filing with the Florida State Department of Health,
Office of Vital Statistics within 5 days after your delivery, and then sent to
Washington, D.C., for which the hospital receives a check for that vessel.
Then the local registrar issued your parents a copy of the warehouse receipt for
the cargo, the CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH from the State of Florida in all CAPITAL
LETTERS, representing a vessel/ward of the State representing the abandonment
of your title by registration. The State of Florida the Creator/Trustor then created
a Cestui que trust (constructive trust) behind your back after the fact, with the all
Upper Lower case name, and placed a value on it, based on actuarial estimates of
your future labor/human resource. Then they issued a Bond against the trust’s
asset, a certificate of indebtedness6 and funded the bond through the IMF based
on your future earnings from your labor as the contributing beneficiary, which is a
trust asset, and set up a Federal Reserve account for the same. So now the IMF
has a beneficial interest in and out of the trust estate, the legal title is now vested
with the State of Florida, and held by the Alien Property Custodian in Washington,
D.C.; equitable title copy of CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH held by you representing
equity/labor; the Governor acting as the managing fiduciary trustee; the Secretary
of State Registrar acting as fiduciary trustee until you turn of legal age; and you
acting as fiduciary trustee for the trust with duties and obligations once you turn
of legal age, and the Secretary of Treasury in charge of the Federal Reserve
account.
That ward/vessel is a now a Vessel of the United States, documented by
registration under the laws of the United States and subject to its laws and
jurisdiction, and the Title goes to the Alien Property Custodian in Washington,
D.C. In a maritime in rem action, jurisdiction over the person of the "defendant",
the vessel, is premised upon the presence of the vessel within the district in which
the court sits. The only vessel they have jurisdiction over is the trust, that is
evidenced by the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH, establishing the three points of
jurisdiction NAME, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER and DATE OF BIRTH, the Federal
Reserve account under the supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury who is
also the managing trustee for the Social Security Administration and governor for
the IMF.
Up until you turned of legal age to work, the deputy Registrar on behalf of the
Registrar/ Secretary of State, or the Registrar/Secretary of State whichever signed
the CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH has been the fiduciary trustee for that trust
created behind your back and securitized where the government owns it in part
and you own it in part. Meaning the Registrar had the fiduciary duty and
obligation for that Trust up until you started your first job. That is why the State
can take the child away from the parents, because it is the duty and obligation of
the fiduciary trustee as guardian, to look after the ward, and make sure he or she
is taken care of properly.
When you filled out the Application Form SS-5 for a Social Security Card, the
Registrar turned over the duty and obligation of the fiduciary trustee over to you,
because he did not want to be responsible as fiduciary for anything you do in
commerce using that SS Card/number. You then became the contributing
beneficiary and fiduciary trustee for that trust with the duties and obligations for
filing and paying the licensing taxes, registration taxes, and taxes on profits, gains
and income generated for the trust once it starts to operate in commerce with a
Social Security Card/number on all commercial transactions, because you on
behalf of the beneficial owner “the trust”, which is resident within a territory
occupied by military forces with which the United States is at war, or a resident
outside the United States, for which you are considered an enemy doing business
with a license and tax identifying number for the purposes “of trade” effectively
connected with the conduct of a trade or business within said territory for which
you are granted a license under the authority of the President pursuant to the
Trading with the Enemy Act, as an enemy in order to trade, or attempt to trade
with the enemy for the beneficial owner the “trust”, and as the fiduciary trustee
paying, satisfying, compromising, or giving security for the payment or
satisfaction of any debt or obligation, and for drawing, accepting, paying,
presenting for acceptance or payment, or indorsing any negotiable instrument or
chose in action on behalf of the trust. So far there are two different styles of your
name being used, one “upper lower case”, first and last name, and an all “UPPER
CASE” first, middle and last name.
__________________________________________________ ____
Delivery1. The act by which the res or substance thereof is placed within the
actual or constructive possession or control of another.
Legal Name2. Under common law, consists of one Christian name and one
surname, and the insertion, omission, or mistake in middle name or initial is
immaterial. The legal name of an individual consists of a given or baptismal name
usually assumed at birth and a surname deriving from the common name of the
parents.
Res3. The subject matter of a trust or will.
Title4. A mark, style or designation, a distinctive appellation. The name by which
anything is known. Thus, in the law of persons, a title is an appellation of dignity
or distinction, a name denoting the social rank of the person bearing it, such as
Duke or Count.
Certificate of Registry5. In maritime law, which is a certificate of registration of a
vessel according to the registry acts, for the purpose of giving her a national
character.
Certificate of Indebtedness6. An obligation sometimes issued by corporations
having practically the same force and effect as a bond, though not usually secured
on any specific property. It may, however, create a lien on all the property of the
corporation issuing it, superior to the rights of general creditors. In banking, same
as a government security, same as a treasury certificate.
Click link to open this excellent 22 page article for easier reading & printing in PDF